Aside

Good (and Bad) Design in Politics, Part 2

Old Posts 2 Comments »

The Great

It’s one day before the most historic election anyone can remember, and the websites are getting traffic hits in the millions as the clock winds down.  The first post focused on the main candidates, but there are other policy groups, politicians, and lobby groups that have fantastic designs.

Better Roads Now

1

I love this site.  It’s super colorful and has a great use of stock photography, great gradients, and a clear call to action (the big button on the right side).  It’s also super easy to read and get updates from.

perspctv

2

I *love* this site.  It’s been my window onto the world of politics online this past election season.  There is so much information that has been elegantly crammed into a small place, but the site still looks open and very free form.  AND, the feeds autoupdate every few seconds, which makes for a great “stay on the site and watch” window on a browser.

Of course, with the great, also comes the not-so-great:

David All Group

3

Normally, I’m a big fan of the rounded corners, but The David All Group website is just plain horribly done.  The spacing is off between the header and navigation (lots of space – it should be a lot less), the header is a different size from the main content (looks like the header was recycled from an old design), the photo in the middle is HORRIBLY photoshopped, and the white on blue text (and the blue on light blue text next to it) clashes horribly.  Overall, it’s a super-poor execution of a site. These guys are a design firm – I expect better.

The Underlying Problem

4

I spent about 20 minutes looking at politicians sites to see examples of just plain bad design, but with the exception of a few firms, most are resorting to the table-based, no-social-media influenced, boring site design.  That’s a problem.  Politicians, at their core, are supposed to represent the people, and if they aren’t evolving (via technology, thought, or otherwise) with those people, then how can we expect them to lead us? 

I think that this election will be a turning point in political design.  We’re going to see sites in the next election that (hopefully) utilize the design trends that are concurrent with modern business or even the personal blogger’s site.  The bloggers are running the show because (as we’ve seen) no one can trust the media.  Polls lie, and yes, even people lie.  Good design, however, is honest, timeless, and will never let you down, no matter what the people writing the content do.

So, before the election tomorrow, are there any good (or bad) websites that you know of that are political / policy based?  Leave them in the comments!

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Thanks for the list! There are quite a few great sites on here!

Below, I added a few more examples. What I think would be an interesting study, and a pain to do, would be to define what makes a good political website, then do an analysis of a large number of sites. Is there a difference between the quality of Republican, Democrat and third-party sites? Does one party seem to produce better websites? Does one group "get" social media better than another? Are state candidate sites better or worse, on whole, than national candidate websites?Some further random websites.Here's one that's table- and div-based. Nice graphics, but WAY too busy Move some of that stuff off of the front page. People are overwhelmed by too much stuff hitting them in the face right off.: http://www.charliebrownforcongress.org/This one's not eye-catching and it's DotNetNuke-based so it's got divs AND tables. But it's nice and clean.: http://www.tammybaldwin.com/This one is far too text-based and some of the images are blurry. Looks kind of homemade. They need brighter, fresher, focused images. Keep the front page simple and put all of that text inside and broken up by white space and images.: http://www.sestakforcongress.com/This one's not beautiful, needs some style, but it is very clean and almost completely div-based.: http://www.maffeiforcongress.com/

Thanks for the list! There are quite a few great sites on here!

Below, I added a few more examples. What I think would be an interesting study, and a pain to do, would be to define what makes a good political website, then do an analysis of a large number of sites. Is there a difference between the quality of Republican, Democrat and third-party sites? Does one party seem to produce better websites? Does one group "get" social media better than another? Are state candidate sites better or worse, on whole, than national candidate websites?

Some further random websites.
Here's one that's table- and div-based. Nice graphics, but WAY too busy Move some of that stuff off of the front page. People are overwhelmed by too much stuff hitting them in the face right off.: http://www.charliebrownforcongress.org/

This one's not eye-catching and it's DotNetNuke-based so it's got divs AND tables. But it's nice and clean.: http://www.tammybaldwin.com/

This one is far too text-based and some of the images are blurry. Looks kind of homemade. They need brighter, fresher, focused images. Keep the front page simple and put all of that text inside and broken up by white space and images.: http://www.sestakforcongress.com/

This one's not beautiful, needs some style, but it is very clean and almost completely div-based.: http://www.maffeiforcongress.com/