<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #Magpie – Spam or Just Another Ad Network?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/</link>
	<description>Nashville, TN&#039;s Best WordPress Designer/Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:09:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: studionashvegas</title>
		<link>http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>studionashvegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studionashvegas.com/2008/11/18/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know... people are making the argument that a Twitter Monitization service would dilute the true, pure nature of the tweets.  I am inclined to agree, but even the advertising i *DO* put onto twitter, I try to give it some sort of benefit to my users (a screencast I did, a blog post on whatever topic, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230; people are making the argument that a Twitter Monitization service would dilute the true, pure nature of the tweets.  I am inclined to agree, but even the advertising i *DO* put onto twitter, I try to give it some sort of benefit to my users (a screencast I did, a blog post on whatever topic, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hubs</title>
		<link>http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>hubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studionashvegas.com/2008/11/18/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I use a service called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twittad.com/a/Ic&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twittad&lt;/a&gt; which allows you to monetize your twitter account in a much less obtrusive way. There business model isn&#039;t as sound as Magpies but the service is much more palatable (and probably profitable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a service called <a href="http://www.twittad.com/a/Ic" rel="nofollow">Twittad</a> which allows you to monetize your twitter account in a much less obtrusive way. There business model isn&#8217;t as sound as Magpies but the service is much more palatable (and probably profitable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studionashvegas.com/2008/11/18/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of Magpie for a variety of reasons, but the main one is just that it drastically diminishes the value of Twitter if you have to spend half your time on the service wading through ads.

I wrote a fuller breakdown of my Magpie thoughts on GeekMommy&#039;s blog, so check out: http://geekmommy.net/2008/11/19/tweet-like-a-nightengale-not-like-a-magpie/#comment-1013 and the original Magpie post that I wrote at: http://thefutureofads.com/2008/11/03/magpie-tries-to-make-twitter-an-ad-network-fails/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of Magpie for a variety of reasons, but the main one is just that it drastically diminishes the value of Twitter if you have to spend half your time on the service wading through ads.</p>
<p>I wrote a fuller breakdown of my Magpie thoughts on GeekMommy&#8217;s blog, so check out: <a href="http://geekmommy.net/2008/11/19/tweet-like-a-nightengale-not-like-a-magpie/#comment-1013" rel="nofollow">http://geekmommy.net/2008/11/19/tweet-like-a-nightengale-not-like-a-magpie/#comment-1013</a> and the original Magpie post that I wrote at: <a href="http://thefutureofads.com/2008/11/03/magpie-tries-to-make-twitter-an-ad-network-fails/" rel="nofollow">http://thefutureofads.com/2008/11/03/magpie-tries-to-make-twitter-an-ad-network-fails/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Duthie</title>
		<link>http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Duthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studionashvegas.com/2008/11/18/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I think Magpie is awful, but I might not be following your argument here. The context magpie looks for is the things you twitter about the most. So an ad for a WordPress developer would be a perfect match for them to slip into your feed (and you&#039;d just love that, right?), whereas an ad for a clothing store would be a fit for @nashvogue.

Take the first three posts you use as an example up there -- the ones about custom, handmade clothing. Two of the three definitely post about Etsy and crafts-related things, therefore the magpie ads posted under their accounts are likely relevant to their followers. (The third, &quot;fewtiq&quot;, posts all kinds of links -- maybe a couple are crafty.)

So I&#039;d say the service works, but it&#039;s still evil. At least it stays somewhat honest by putting the #magpie tag at the front of each ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Magpie is awful, but I might not be following your argument here. The context magpie looks for is the things you twitter about the most. So an ad for a WordPress developer would be a perfect match for them to slip into your feed (and you&#8217;d just love that, right?), whereas an ad for a clothing store would be a fit for @nashvogue.</p>
<p>Take the first three posts you use as an example up there &#8212; the ones about custom, handmade clothing. Two of the three definitely post about Etsy and crafts-related things, therefore the magpie ads posted under their accounts are likely relevant to their followers. (The third, &#8220;fewtiq&#8221;, posts all kinds of links &#8212; maybe a couple are crafty.)</p>
<p>So I&#8217;d say the service works, but it&#8217;s still evil. At least it stays somewhat honest by putting the #magpie tag at the front of each ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottmunc</title>
		<link>http://www.studionashvegas.com/old-posts/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>scottmunc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studionashvegas.com/2008/11/18/magpie-spam-or-just-another-ad-network/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Cool idea, hadn&#039;t heard of it before this post.  Not sure I would like someone using my account to post ads, now matter how much they paid.  It takes a while to establish a good list of followers posting only content I think they will enjoy.  I think this would take away that trust I have built.

@startmysong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool idea, hadn&#8217;t heard of it before this post.  Not sure I would like someone using my account to post ads, now matter how much they paid.  It takes a while to establish a good list of followers posting only content I think they will enjoy.  I think this would take away that trust I have built.</p>
<p>@startmysong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 400/405 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.studionashvegas.com

Served from: www.studionashvegas.com @ 2012-02-10 04:00:02 -->
